Stops federal pensions for government employees convicted of certain sex crimes.
Senator Ernst (R, IA), co-sponsored by 3 Republicans and 1 Democrat.
Introduced in Senate, referred to committee.
The bill amends existing law to prevent individuals convicted of specific federal or equivalent state sex crimes from receiving federal retirement benefits (annuities and retired pay) if the conviction occurs after the bill becomes law. It was introduced by Senator Joni Ernst (R-IA) along with Senators Gillibrand (D-NY), Scott (R-FL), Crapo (R-ID), and Graham (R-SC). It is currently awaiting review in the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee.
Introduced Apr 30, 2026
Senator Ernst introduced this bill in the Senate on April 30, 2026. It has been referred to the Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs for review. For the bill to become law, it must pass through this committee, be voted on and passed by the full Senate, then pass the House of Representatives, and finally be signed by the President.
If this bill passes, any current or former federal government employee convicted of certain severe federal sex offenses (like sexual abuse, sexual exploitation of children, or sex trafficking) or equivalent state crimes after the bill's enactment date would forfeit their federal pension and retirement pay. This aims to ensure that public money is not used to provide retirement benefits to individuals found guilty of these specific offenses.
Supporters Say
Supporters argue this bill ensures federal retirement funds do not go to individuals convicted of serious sex crimes, upholding public trust.
Critics Say
No specific criticisms are evident in the bill text itself.
The bill's title, 'No Taxpayer-Funded Pensions for Sex Criminals Act,' clearly indicates the intent of its sponsors to prevent individuals convicted of serious sex offenses from receiving federal retirement benefits. The bill specifies that it applies to offenses occurring on or after its enactment date, which addresses common concerns about retroactive application.