A bill to require the Secretary of Agriculture and the Secretary of the Interior to ensure that the information technology and cybersecurity and information security systems of the Department of Agriculture and the Department of the Interior are interoperable, and for other purposes.

Bill Number: S 4453|Origin Chamber: Senate|Status: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry.|Policy Area: Unclassified

TL;DR

What

Makes USDA and Interior IT systems share info for land management, disasters.

Who

Introduced by Mr. Schiff and Mr. Ricketts.

Status

Introduced in the Senate, currently in committee.

This bill, officially called the LINK Act, requires the Departments of Agriculture and the Interior to make their information technology systems work together. This will help them share data for things like wildfire operations and disaster response. It was introduced in the Senate by Mr. Schiff and Mr. Ricketts and has been sent to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry for review.

Where Is This Bill?

Introduced
Committee
House Vote
Senate
Law

Introduced Apr 30, 2026

This bill was introduced in the Senate on April 30, 2026, and was then sent to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry. It must pass through this committee, be voted on by the full Senate, and then pass the House of Representatives before it can be sent to the President to become law.

If This Passes, You Might Notice

If this bill passes, the Departments of Agriculture and the Interior would be able to share information more easily, leading to potentially quicker and more coordinated responses to events like wildfires and natural disasters. The bill also aims to streamline internal business operations for these departments. Importantly, it includes provisions to protect sensitive data, including Tribal proprietary data, ensuring that increased data sharing doesn't compromise privacy or security.

The Debate

Supporters Say

Supporters would argue it improves government efficiency and public safety through better data sharing.

Critics Say

Critics might raise concerns about the complexity and cost of integrating large government IT systems.

Supporters would likely highlight the immediate benefits of improved coordination for critical functions like wildfire management and disaster response, potentially saving lives and resources. They would emphasize the modernization of outdated systems. Critics, however, might express concerns about the significant financial investment and technical challenges involved in achieving interoperability across two large federal departments, as well as the potential for unforeseen system vulnerabilities during integration.