Davis-Bacon Repeal Act

Bill Number: S 4477|Origin Chamber: Senate|Status: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.|Policy Area: Unclassified

TL;DR

What

Repeals federal construction prevailing wage law.

Who

Sen. Lee (R-UT) and 8 Republican senators.

Status

Introduced in Senate, referred to committee.

This bill would eliminate the federal law requiring specific wage rates for workers on federal construction projects. Senator Mike Lee (R-UT) introduced it, alongside several other Republican senators. It was sent to the Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee for review.

Sponsors

Cosponsors

No cosponsors found.

Where Is This Bill?

Introduced
Committee
House Vote
Senate
Law

Introduced Apr 30, 2026

The bill was introduced in the Senate on April 30, 2026, and immediately referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. It must pass this committee, then the full Senate, and then the House of Representatives before it can be signed into law by the President.

If This Passes, You Might Notice

If this bill passes, workers on future federal construction projects would no longer be guaranteed a prevailing wage determined by the government; their wages would instead be subject to market rates. This could potentially lower labor costs for contractors, which might reduce the overall cost of federal projects for taxpayers. However, any ongoing contracts or bids outstanding within 30 days of the bill becoming law would continue under the old wage requirements.

The Debate

Supporters Say

Supporters of repealing prevailing wage laws like Davis-Bacon often argue it reduces government project costs.

Critics Say

Critics often contend that repealing such laws could lead to lower wages and less skilled labor on federal projects.

Advocates for repealing the Davis-Bacon Act typically point to potential savings for taxpayers by allowing contractors to pay market-based wages instead of federally mandated rates. Conversely, opponents frequently express concerns that such a repeal could drive down wages for construction workers, potentially affecting their living standards and the overall quality of federal infrastructure projects.